Latest StoriesRSS

select from:

E.g., 9/21/2019
E.g., 9/21/2019

Trump is far happier with Lewandowski's testimony than he should be

09/18/19 08:40AM

The circumstances may not have seemed historic at first blush, but the House Judiciary Committee held its first hearing yesterday since establishing the parameters of its impeachment inquiry into Donald Trump. The result was dramatic in more ways than one.

The hearing was supposed to feature testimony from former White House Deputy Chief of Staff Rick Dearborn and former White House Staff Secretary Rob Porter, both of whom were featured several times in Robert Mueller's special counsel report, both of whom were witnesses to potential presidential criminal behavior, and both of whom were instructed by the White House not to speak to the Judiciary Committee.

Corey Lewandowski, the first of Trump's three 2016 campaign managers, did agree to participate in the proceedings, but it's tough to describe his testimony as "cooperation." The Republican operative, eyeing a U.S. Senate campaign in New Hampshire, seemed eager to do everything he could to turn the hearing into a food fight -- to the president's delight.

It was, to be sure, a frustrating afternoon. Trump refused to allow his former White House aides to testify, and he instructed a private citizen -- who never worked in the White House -- not to answer relevant questions about alleged misdeeds he personally witnessed. The idea that the president has the authority to block legitimate federal investigations because he feels like is, to put it mildly, problematic.

That said, I think Jonathan Allen's piece for NBC News gets this right: Trump was far happier with yesterday's hearing than he probably should have been.

The first hearing of the Democratic-led House Judiciary Committee's effort to develop articles of impeachment against Trump was a contentious affair in which Lewandowski, Trump's 2016 campaign manager and the lone witness, said Democrats "hate this president more than they love their country."

But no one -- not Lewandowski nor committee Republicans -- seriously disputed the central theme of the day: that Trump had gone to extreme lengths in circumventing the entirety of the federal government to get Lewandowski to instruct then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions to publicly announce that the president had done nothing wrong and limit the scope of special counsel Robert Mueller's probe in 2017.

Ultimately, Lewandowski put flesh on the bones that Mueller gave the committee in his report.

None of this was good news for Team Trump.

read more

Trump admin escalates fight over intel whistleblower complaint

09/18/19 08:00AM

It's possible that the whistleblower complaint from within the U.S. intelligence community is relatively benign. Maybe it has nothing to do with Donald Trump. Maybe the underlying concern is technical and inconsequential in nature.

But given the Trump administration's recent conduct, it's awfully tough to give the relevant officials the benefit of the doubt. The New York Times reported overnight:

The acting director of national intelligence will not testify before Congress this week or immediately hand over a whistle-blower complaint to lawmakers, escalating a standoff between Capitol Hill and leaders of the intelligence agencies.

Following up on Rachel's report from last night and our earlier coverage, let's recap where things stand. Someone within the U.S. intelligence community sent a complaint to the intelligence community's inspector general, and while we don't know about the nature of the complaint, the IG reviewed it and found it credible.

Just as importantly, the matter was deemed "urgent."

Under our system, this is supposed to set a series of dominoes in motion, including an alert to the director of National Intelligence. That, by all accounts, is what occurred. (There is currently no Senate-confirmed DNI, but Joseph Maguire is there in an acting capacity.)

At that point, by law, the DNI has seven days to alert the congressional Intelligence committees. And that's the step the Trump administration is refusing to take.

Instead, Maguire told House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) that the complaint refers to someone outside the intelligence community and it involves matters that are privileged. This, evidently, was supposed to justify the DNI's legally dubious secrecy.

Not surprisingly, this has led to some speculation about whether the complaint is about Donald Trump – which also raises the specter of the acting DNI, appointed by the president, ignoring his legal obligations, and withholding a credible whistleblower complaint, possibly to protect Trump from yet another scandal.

Which, in itself, would be pretty scandalous.

read more

Intel chief escalates standoff over secret whistle-blower report

Intel chief escalates standoff over secret whistle-blower report

09/17/19 09:17PM

Rachel Maddow reports on acting-DNI Joseph Maguire missing the deadline set by House Intel chairman Adam Schiff to turn over a whistle-blower report as the law requires him to do, noting that the next step will likely be a subpoena for Maguire to appear before Congress to explain himself and the contents of the report, which the IC inspector... watch

Tuesday's Mini-Report, 9.17.19

09/17/19 05:30PM

Today's edition of quick hits:

* Afghanistan: "An explosion near an election rally attended by Afghan President Ashraf Ghani killed 26 people -- including 4 security forces -- and injured 42 others, local officials said, but Ghani was unhurt according to an aide."

* Impeachment process: "Democrats pressed Corey Lewandowski at a contentious House hearing on Tuesday, with at least one member calling for the former Trump campaign manager to be held in contempt for following a White House directive to limit the scope of his testimony."

* A murky electoral picture in Israel: "Polls closed in Israel's razor-tight election Tuesday as embattled Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sought to maintain his decadelong hold on power."

* Middle East: "The attack on a major Saudi oil facility originated geographically from Iranian territory, with a series of low-altitude cruise missiles fired from at least one location in the western region of the country, according to two U.S. officials familiar with the latest intelligence."

* Border barriers: "The Defense Department is no longer moving forward with three border barrier projects in California and Arizona, according to a court filing Monday. The move is a reversal of an earlier Pentagon authorization for about 20 miles of fencing, lighting and other border infrastructure that would have used $2.5 billion in funds redirected from a counter-drug fund."

* That was quick: "It hasn't yet been a full week, but it appears [former National Security Adviser John Bolton has] found a vehicle for clearing the air. According to two people with knowledge of the situation, Bolton has already expressed interest in writing a book on his time in the Trump administration, and has been in contact in recent days with literary agents interested in making that happen."

* Even if Republicans weren't persuaded by the national security arguments, it'd be nice if the fiscal arguments mattered: "Holding the Nazi war criminal Rudolf Hess as the lone prisoner in Germany's Spandau Prison in 1985 cost an estimated $1.5 million in today's dollars. The per-prisoner bill in 2012 at the 'supermax' facility in Colorado, home to some of the highest-risk prisoners in the United States, was $78,000. Then there is Guantánamo Bay, where the expense now works out to about $13 million for each of the 40 prisoners being held there."

read more

U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) on his way back to his office Jan. 28, 2015 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty)

Trump admin under increasing pressure on whistleblower complaint

09/17/19 12:47PM

The burgeoning controversy surrounding the Trump administration withholding a complaint from an intelligence-community whistleblower is starting to intensify. It was good to see the editorial board of the Washington Post publish a piece on this overnight:

Mr. Trump has made plain his distaste for congressional oversight. Elsewhere, he's resisting disclosure of his tax returns to the House Ways and Means Committee, although the law in that case also is straightforward. Oversight is a vital function of Congress, one that's not always performed as strenuously as it should be. At the same time, the Supreme Court has ruled that it can't lead to boundless inquisitions. [...]

In the case of the intelligence-community whistleblower, this clearly falls under the definition of a legitimate task of Congress. Someone inside the intelligence community decided to follow the rules and filed this complaint for a reason. Neither [acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire] nor Mr. Trump should be able to conceal such information. They should respect and uphold the law, not contravene it.

As Rachel explained on the show last night, the available facts in this matter do not appear to be in dispute. Someone within the U.S. intelligence community sent a complaint to the intelligence community's inspector general, and while we don't know about the nature of the complaint, the IG reviewed it and found it credible.

Just as importantly, the matter was deemed "urgent."

Under our system, this is supposed to set a series of dominoes in motion, including an alert to the director of National Intelligence. That, by all accounts is what occurred. (There is currently no Senate-confirmed DNI, but Joseph Maguire is there in an acting capacity.)

At that point, by law, the DNI has seven days to alert the congressional Intelligence committees. And that's the step the Trump administration, at least for now, is refusing to take.

read more

Tuesday's Campaign Round-Up, 9.17.19

09/17/19 12:00PM

Today's installment of campaign-related news items from across the country.

* During his campaign rally in New Mexico last night, Donald Trump suggested CNN contributor Steve Cortes doesn't "look" Hispanic enough, before asking him, "Who do you love more, the country or Hispanics? I don't know. I may have to go for the Hispanics, to be honest with you. We got a lot of Hispanics." It was as odd as it sounds.

* Speaking of the president, he'll be in California today -- a state Trump has routinely panned -- for a fundraising swing. He can expect to see more than a few protesters.

* In the race for the Democratic presidential nomination four years ago, the progressive Working Families Party threw its support to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). This year, it's supporting Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).

* There's still some question as to when New York will hold its Democratic presidential primary, but in the meantime, the latest Siena poll suggests it'll be a close contest: former Vice President Joe Biden (D) leads the field with 22%, followed by Warren at 17% and Sanders at 15%. No other candidate tops 5% in the poll.

* Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) hasn't yet made a splash in the 2020 presidential race, and he didn't qualify for last week's debate, but the Coloradan is nevertheless making a seven-figure ad buy, with an emphasis on Iowa.

read more

U.S.  President Obama meets with President-elect Trump in the White House Oval Office in Washington

Trump's search for evidence against Obama isn't going well

09/17/19 11:20AM

The first sign of trouble emerged in July, when Donald Trump was speaking at a White House foreign-policy event, The president was whining about the investigations into his various scandals when he had an idea: Trump would try to shift the focus to his predecessor.

"We want to find out what happened with the last Democrat president," Trump said. "Let's look into Obama the way they've looked at me. From day one, they've looked into everything that we've done. They could look into the book deal that President Obama made. Let's subpoena all of his records."

There wasn't anything especially notable about Barack Obama signing a book deal after he'd left office; many modern presidents have done the same thing. But Trump suggested there might be something nefarious about the agreement because ... well, just because.

Yesterday, he was back at it.

Instead of investigating reports suggesting that Trump is using his presidency to enrich his businesses, Democrats should look at Obama's book and Netflix deals, the president said.

"I have a better idea. Look at the Obama Book Deal, or the ridiculous Netflix deal," Trump tweeted.

Soon after, Trump published more tweets defending himself from corruption allegations, and he tacked on "Obama Netflix?" as if it were self-explanatory.

It was not. In fact, these pointless jabs suggest Trump doesn't fully appreciate the nature of the corruption allegations he's facing.

To hear the Republican tell it, Obama is making money through private-sector deals and Trump is making money through private-sector deals. Why is everyone making a fuss about his alleged self-dealing while Obama gets by without scrutiny?

read more

This Jan. 17, 2017, file photo shows General Electric light bulbs on display at a store, in Wilmington, Mass.

Trump pitches his lightbulb policy as a matter of personal vanity

09/17/19 10:43AM

Two weeks ago, the Trump administration rolled back lightbulb energy-efficiency standards, which, as we've discussed, represented a pointless step backwards for U.S. energy policy.

As The Hill’s report on this noted, the new rule "will increase U.S. electricity use by 80 billion kilowatt hours over the course of a year, roughly the amount of electricity needed to power all households in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, according to an analysis by the Appliance Standards Awareness Project."

Last night, at a campaign rally in New Mexico, the president defended the policy by emphasizing the importance of his personal vanity.

"I wanted incandescent light. I wanted to look better, OK? I wanted to pay less money to look better."

For now, let's put aside the fact that energy-efficient lightbulbs, in the long run, end up costing consumers less money. Instead, let's note that Trump has been talking to the point of preoccupation about lightbulbs and his perceptions about his personal appearance.

Here he was, for example, at a campaign rally in North Carolina last week:

"I'm not a vain person, and I know I have no vain people especially these incredible ladies in the front, but I look better under an incandescent light than these crazy lights that are beaming down on us."

A few days later, he addressed the House Republican Conference:

"The lightbulb. People said, 'What's with the lightbulb?' I said, 'Here's the story…' And I looked at it – the bulb that we're being forced to use – number one, to me, most importantly, the light is no good. I always look orange."

Stanford's Ken Schultz joked last night, "The Republican argument for inefficient lightbulbs has gone from individual liberty to individual vanity."

read more

Image: Donald Trump, William Barr, Wilbur Ross

Commerce secretary's investments spark controversy (again)

09/17/19 10:24AM

The sheer volume of controversies surrounding Wilbur Ross is almost impressive. Just over the last couple of months, Donald Trump's Commerce secretary reportedly threatened to fire NOAA officials unless they endorsed the president's misstatement about a hurricane, was blamed for the White House's failed Census gambit, and was characterized as a hapless leader of a cabinet agency that's reportedly reaching "new heights of dysfunction."

And while Ross and his team have pushed back against each of these stories, things don't appear to be getting any better for the Commerce secretary. Forbes' Dan Alexander reported last night:

Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross did not cut ties to a shipping fund he promised to divest, according to a new financial disclosure report obtained by Forbes. He still owns an interest in Starboard Recovery Associates LP worth $1,000 to $15,000. Under the liabilities section of the filing, Ross also lists a "capital commitment" to a related company for $1 million to $5 million. [...]

According to the new filing, Ross' remaining interest in Starboard gives him an indirect share of a handful of shipping assets with nondescriptive names like WLR/TRF KZ Holding I LLC and WLR/TRF Tanker Two LLC. Forbes obtained additional documents that describe the business of several of those holdings. Many of the companies were created to invest in the products of shipyards in the Philippines, China, Vietnam, Japan and South Korea.

In case this isn't already obvious, it's not great when a Commerce secretary, whose agency works on international shipping, maintains private investments in international shipping.

If this sounds at all familiar, it's because there have been other reports along these same lines during his tenure about Ross maintaining stakes "in companies co-owned by the Chinese government, a shipping firm tied to Vladimir Putin's inner circle, a Cypriot bank reportedly caught up in the Robert Mueller investigation and a huge player in an industry Ross is now investigating."

Two months ago, Ross said he was moving forward with a plan to sell all of his equity holdings, though as Forbes added last night, the Commerce secretary "did not get rid of everything."

read more

North Korea's leader Kim Jong Un walks to greet Donald Trump at the Military Demarcation Line that divides North and South Korea, in the Joint Security Area (JSA) of Panmunjom in the Demilitarized zone (DMZ) on June 30, 2019.

After visiting North Korea, Trump says he won't visit North Korea

09/17/19 09:20AM

A South Korean newspaper reported yesterday that North Korea's Kim Jong-un invited Donald Trump to Pyongyang as a way to restart failing nuclear talks. A reporter asked Trump yesterday whether the report was accurate.

"I don't want to comment on that," the American president replied. "The relationship is very good, but I don't want to comment on it."

A moment later, Trump was asked whether he'd be willing to go to North Korea. The Republican added:

"Probably not. I don't think it's ready. I don't think we're ready for that. I would do it sometime at -- sometime at a later future. And depending on what happens, I'm sure he'll love coming to the United States also. But, no, I don't think it's ready for that. I think we have a ways to go yet."

Not to put too fine a point on this, but didn't Trump already go to North Korea?

The rogue nuclear state may not be "ready" to welcome a sitting American president to North Korean soil, but it was just a few months ago when Trump nevertheless walked through the demilitarized zone and made a spectacle of a stroll alongside his dictatorial pal.

The New York Times reported in July, "In another administration, such a move might have been deliberated for weeks, put through an interagency process and approved only as part of a comprehensive approach to pressuring North Korea into giving up its nuclear program -- a reward for progress. Mr. Trump himself had previously been talked out of just such a move by cautious advisers. But this time he could not resist the idea of a showy 'first,' whether it fit a long-term strategy or not."

He couldn't even tell the truth at the time about how the events unfolded:

read more

Pages