IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Gen. Petraeus neo-con connection 'is really strange'

Let me finish tonight with this. I'd like to know why General Petraeus was taking day-to-day advice from people on the other side of the Iraq war argument.
Hardball-Let Me Finish
Hardball-Let Me Finish

Let me finish tonight with this.

I'd like to know why General Petraeus was taking day-to-day advice from people on the other side of the Iraq war argument.

Fred and Kimberly Kagan are hawks. They share the ideology of those who backed the Iraq War. Why are they on the inside of an administration elected based on its opposition to the Iraq war?

I am one of those who believed from square one that the war in Iraq was an ideological war pushed from the outset by those who wanted us to overthrow the Iraq government and install ourselves in Baghdad. They got their way under a less-than-informed President, George W. Bush. Now we discover that a pair of them, the Kagans, have been right there in the room with the head of the Afghan mission, advising him every step of the way.

Why? Why did General Petraeus assume the right to allow people who represent the very opposite of President Obama's philosophy to advise him? What agenda was his seeking here? What was he buying into? Was he buying into the hawkish agenda of those who advocated war on Iraq in the first place? If so, why was he working for President Obama who stood out there against that war?

I have to think that Petraeus either doesn't understand politics and ideology or he shapes his ideology, or accepts the ideology of those who have stood against Obama from the beginning.  This is really strange, really strange and someone in the administration better start paying attention to who is getting into the tent and who they are indeed working for.

Backing the Iraq war and the mentality behind it is no small thing.